It is amazing how many people eat off of Jewish pain and suffering. I think this is another reason why all societies have scapegoats—when there's nothing else to eat, you can always tear one more hunk of flesh off the goat.
Maybe one of the reasons Jews still exist all these thousands of years later is because of the use they provide their enemies in giving them a way to offload all their hatred and fear. If Jews didn't exist, their enemies would have to invent them.
I have heard Morgan vilify Israel’s conduct of the war in Gaza. Coupled with his lack of a moral compass and profiteering from Jewish suffering, I think he’s at least an antisemite adjacent.
Jill, the reason he focuses on this one conflict is precisely the reason that I get 50+ reactions for my posts on Israel and 10-20 for the rest. If I followed his lead I might make some money here!!!
His recent episode with Shitweasel Jones proves that he doesn’t simply jump on every antisemitic train that’s running (and he also proved that early on in this conflict). What it does show is an addiction to publicly humiliating whoever he feels like humiliating on a given day - kind of how a school bully behaves in order to assert one’s dominance over others , and to ultimately try to redeem themselves in front of an audience because they know deep down that they are cowardly asshats.
piers morgan platforms Jew haters and allows them to speak freely, while he rudely interrupts Jews who attempt to explain to his listeners why he is wrong about most anything he says about Israel. He didn't allow Natasha Hausdorff to speak, and I doubt it had anything to do with her youthful sexuality and the fact she is attractive. He would not allow her to speak because she is intelligent and would poke holes in his false contentions. His purpose in having her on the show was to display his bona fides to Jew hating listeners, and so he could moronically claim he gives equal time to those folk who support Israel.
Is he cleverly exposing the truth of our society and its use of Jewish scapegoating? Maybe what he’s exposing is a reflection on the current social psychosis. True that it’s not actually helping anyone form debate and understanding, his platform feels like the patients are running the asylums, much like what’s actually happening in the UK and the USA today, that the narrative is so much like a playbook of the soviets or elders of Zion.
I am curious - exactly how many journalists have been killed in Gaza and under what circumstances? What news organizations were they affiliated with? How many of them avoided areas that the IDF warned they were targeting, and how many put themselves in harm's way? Finally, how many actually had Hamas affiliation?
Exactly this. I've gone back and forth on this guy. He's acquitted himself well on many occasions both on his show and off (Real Time; a recent interview with another British media personality, etc.) but his constant bringing back of neo-Nazi filth like Candace Owens, Bilzerian, Tate, Nerdeen Kiswani, Dave Smith, and a seemingly endless list of deranged or know-nothing Israel- and Jew-haters (including a po-faced, masculine-voiced blonde American woman whose name I can't recall but who may be the worst of the bunch), makes it pretty clear he knows he can get "eyeballs" from their appearances on his show. Piers' pushback on these cretins is usually only token, except in rare instances. He's clearly helping this antisemitic scum increase their reach, and they're making him money. He's not an antisemite, he's just amoral.
Personally, I can't imagine living with myself for doing what Piers does, but I guess that's what wealth and "fame" do to some people. As long as they're making a good living from it, they don't care who they hurt and destroy.
The Jerry Springer reference is very relevant. If you've seen the documentary about his show, it makes it clear the toxic/trainwreck stuff was like a heroin addiction for his producers. Once you start with it, you have to maintain and/or up the dose. I don't doubt for a second that's what Piers' producers are telling him (or he's telling himself). Once you start platforming attention-whores like Owens, Bilzerian, Smith, etc. and you get the payoff from that, you can't stop, or you'll lose the audience. He's not going to bring on people who can discuss the specifics or complexities of Israel. They're never going to get the ratings of a Black Nazi, a failed, gibbering comedian in a hoodie, or a steroid-casualty professional gambler Charlottesville mongoloid.
Springer was a good guy with a solid moral compass who fell into trash TV and stayed with it because that's what sold. Piers on the other hand lacks a moral compass and actually believes that the trash he produces is quality. That's the difference.
Did you read the piece he wrote for his substack after what happened with Natasha? The man is really is an imbecile. A rich and famous imbecile, but an imbecile nonetheless.
I also dont think it has anything to do with him being a boomer. Because he lets that Anna Kasparian drone on and on with her antisemitism. He never interrupts her. I think he attacked Natasha because he gets more clicks that way and the more clicks the better his advertising dollar. I think he knows his audience and for him its not about truth or honesty its about money.
He’s still a c**t though 😝
True!
Lol...I second that.
He is annoying as hell!
It is amazing how many people eat off of Jewish pain and suffering. I think this is another reason why all societies have scapegoats—when there's nothing else to eat, you can always tear one more hunk of flesh off the goat.
Maybe one of the reasons Jews still exist all these thousands of years later is because of the use they provide their enemies in giving them a way to offload all their hatred and fear. If Jews didn't exist, their enemies would have to invent them.
Morgan may not be a Jew-hater, but he's certainly friendly enough to those who are. In my mind, that makes him not much better than they are.
I have heard Morgan vilify Israel’s conduct of the war in Gaza. Coupled with his lack of a moral compass and profiteering from Jewish suffering, I think he’s at least an antisemite adjacent.
But he always backs that up with "well I always ask them if they condemn Hamas!" Smooth
Jill, the reason he focuses on this one conflict is precisely the reason that I get 50+ reactions for my posts on Israel and 10-20 for the rest. If I followed his lead I might make some money here!!!
I believe we have more rights to that, since, well...we are members of the ethnic group being dragged here.
I think he did a grand total of 1 episode about India/Pakistan, but I'm guessing it didn't do so well because the topic was never repeated.
I agree that we have more right Jill, but Piers understands where the money is.
Hold on a sec...we are Jewish! Shouldn't we be the experts in that?! =P
Haha. Unfortunately I'm too constrained by morality!
Basically Joe Rogan minus any intelligence.
His recent episode with Shitweasel Jones proves that he doesn’t simply jump on every antisemitic train that’s running (and he also proved that early on in this conflict). What it does show is an addiction to publicly humiliating whoever he feels like humiliating on a given day - kind of how a school bully behaves in order to assert one’s dominance over others , and to ultimately try to redeem themselves in front of an audience because they know deep down that they are cowardly asshats.
I think Owen is just butt-hurt about getting thrown out of the Butt Mitzvah party. =P
piers morgan platforms Jew haters and allows them to speak freely, while he rudely interrupts Jews who attempt to explain to his listeners why he is wrong about most anything he says about Israel. He didn't allow Natasha Hausdorff to speak, and I doubt it had anything to do with her youthful sexuality and the fact she is attractive. He would not allow her to speak because she is intelligent and would poke holes in his false contentions. His purpose in having her on the show was to display his bona fides to Jew hating listeners, and so he could moronically claim he gives equal time to those folk who support Israel.
He is JEW HATER adjacent
Is he cleverly exposing the truth of our society and its use of Jewish scapegoating? Maybe what he’s exposing is a reflection on the current social psychosis. True that it’s not actually helping anyone form debate and understanding, his platform feels like the patients are running the asylums, much like what’s actually happening in the UK and the USA today, that the narrative is so much like a playbook of the soviets or elders of Zion.
I am curious - exactly how many journalists have been killed in Gaza and under what circumstances? What news organizations were they affiliated with? How many of them avoided areas that the IDF warned they were targeting, and how many put themselves in harm's way? Finally, how many actually had Hamas affiliation?
Exactly this. I've gone back and forth on this guy. He's acquitted himself well on many occasions both on his show and off (Real Time; a recent interview with another British media personality, etc.) but his constant bringing back of neo-Nazi filth like Candace Owens, Bilzerian, Tate, Nerdeen Kiswani, Dave Smith, and a seemingly endless list of deranged or know-nothing Israel- and Jew-haters (including a po-faced, masculine-voiced blonde American woman whose name I can't recall but who may be the worst of the bunch), makes it pretty clear he knows he can get "eyeballs" from their appearances on his show. Piers' pushback on these cretins is usually only token, except in rare instances. He's clearly helping this antisemitic scum increase their reach, and they're making him money. He's not an antisemite, he's just amoral.
Personally, I can't imagine living with myself for doing what Piers does, but I guess that's what wealth and "fame" do to some people. As long as they're making a good living from it, they don't care who they hurt and destroy.
The Jerry Springer reference is very relevant. If you've seen the documentary about his show, it makes it clear the toxic/trainwreck stuff was like a heroin addiction for his producers. Once you start with it, you have to maintain and/or up the dose. I don't doubt for a second that's what Piers' producers are telling him (or he's telling himself). Once you start platforming attention-whores like Owens, Bilzerian, Smith, etc. and you get the payoff from that, you can't stop, or you'll lose the audience. He's not going to bring on people who can discuss the specifics or complexities of Israel. They're never going to get the ratings of a Black Nazi, a failed, gibbering comedian in a hoodie, or a steroid-casualty professional gambler Charlottesville mongoloid.
Springer was a good guy with a solid moral compass who fell into trash TV and stayed with it because that's what sold. Piers on the other hand lacks a moral compass and actually believes that the trash he produces is quality. That's the difference.
Did you read the piece he wrote for his substack after what happened with Natasha? The man is really is an imbecile. A rich and famous imbecile, but an imbecile nonetheless.
I also dont think it has anything to do with him being a boomer. Because he lets that Anna Kasparian drone on and on with her antisemitism. He never interrupts her. I think he attacked Natasha because he gets more clicks that way and the more clicks the better his advertising dollar. I think he knows his audience and for him its not about truth or honesty its about money.